Who was the subject of an advertisement in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?

“Several valuable NEGROES.”
The first week of 1775 was a busy one in Charles Crouch’s printing office “on the Bay, the Corner of Elliott-street” in Charleston. Crouch published the South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal on Tuesday, January 3, distributing it to subscribers on the usual day. The standard four-page issue, however, could not contain all the content that Crouch received for that edition. Accordingly, he released a two-page supplement, composed entirely of advertisements, on the same day. Yet Crouch’s press was not finished with the “freshest Advices, both Foreign and Domestic,” for the week. Two days later, a two-page Supplement to the South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal carried both news and advertising. It featured updates from Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, as well as local news. Advertising appeared on both sides of the broadsheet, accounting for just under half of the content. Many of those advertisements ran in the standard edition or its supplement just two days earlier. Thanks to the news that Crouch determined to publish immediately rather than wait nearly a week for the next issue, all the advertisements in the January 5 supplement circulated sooner than anticipated.
Initially, I did not notice that Crouch published the second supplement on January 5 rather than January 3. Both supplements have been cataloged with the standard edition for that week in the database of digitized eighteenth-century newspapers I consult for this project. It seemed strange to have two two-page supplements rather than one four-page supplement on a single day. Although uncommon, that arrangement was not unknown, especially when a printer received breaking news after the supplement went to press. When I downloaded the standard issue and the supplements, I was in enough of a hurry to move on to other tasks that I did not look closely enough at the mastheads to spot “THURSDAY, JANUARY 5” instead of “TUESDAY, JANUARY 3” on the second supplement. I noticed only later when I worked more intensively with the advertisements, questioning why John Grafton’s advertisement ran twice on the same day. On closer inspection, I discovered that it made its second appearance in the January 5 supplement. I could have been frustrated that the database did not include a separate entry for the January 5 supplement, but I recognized that I had overlooked the date in the masthead more than once when working with the file I downloaded. My own lack of attention to detail had almost led me into attributing incorrect dates to notices compiled for the Slavery Adverts 250 Project (including the advertisement featured above). This incident served as a good reminder to work carefully with primary sources, including digitized primary sources, because minor errors do happen no matter how carefully and conscientiously catalogers, archivists, librarians, historians, and others go about the work of making documents more widely accessible.










