What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago today?

“BEHOLD A COWARD!”
The harsh tone exceeded what appeared in other advertisements placed for the same purpose. Before the Revolutionary War, advertisements for runaways abounded in American newspapers. Aggrieved masters ran advertisements for runaway indentured servants, runaway apprentices, and runaway convict servants. The notices described the runaways and offered rewards for their capture and return. Disgruntled enslavers ran similar advertisements about enslaved men and women who liberated themselves by running away. After the war began, desertion notices started appearing. In many instances, the number of desertion notices eclipsed advertisements about indentured servants, apprentices, convict servants, and enslaved people combined.
Like those familiar advertisements, desertion notices usually followed a familiar format. Consider one that appeared in the November 6, 1776, edition of the Massachusetts Spy: “DESERTED from Captain William Gate’s Company, in Colonel Jonathan Holman’s Regiment, … Arthur Cary, a Soldier.” The advertisement described Cary’s featured and clothing. “Whoever will take up said deserter,” the notice continued, “and return him to me … shall have ten dollars reward and all reasonable charges paid.” Many similar advertisements appeared in other newspapers in the fall of 1776.
The advertisement that ran immediately above that one in the Massachusetts Spy took a different approach. It started with a headline that forcefully condemned the deserter: “BEHOLD A COWARD!” It then told a story about the circumstances under which “DANIEL PITTEE, Ensign, in Capt. Timothy Stow’s Company, in Col. Wheelock’s Regiment,” deserted from “Head Quarters, [at] Ticonderoga” in October. “THE PUBLIC are desired to take notice,” the advertisement proclaimed, that Pittee “applied … for a discharge upon hearing that the enemy were likely to attack our lines – he was refused and the next Day deserted the Camp.” The notice, “Published by order of Brigadier General [James] Brickett,” ran in the Massachusetts Spy and newspapers published in Boston because the “infamous Runaway belongs to the south Parish of Dedham, County of Suffolk,” and his officers apparently suspected he was headed that way. Unlike other advertisements about deserters, this one did not offer a reward for returning him to his regiment. Instead, it aimed to humiliate and demean the deserter. Pittee’s request for a discharge when an attack was likely may have been the deciding factor. Such cowardice differed from the motivations of other soldiers who deserted in hopes of returning home to protect and aid their families. The headline certainly attracted attention. From the very first line, this desertion notice differed from others that so often appeared in newspapers during the Revolutionary War.






























