What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago today?

“JOHN ATKINS … was seen wheeling a wheelbarrow … for a woman selling liquor.”
It was a rare instance of an aggrieved wife running a response to an advertisement that her husband placed to describe her supposed bad behavior and cut off her access to credit. It began with a notice that John Atkins inserted in the February 19, 1776, edition of Dunlap’s Pennsylvania Packet: “WHEREAS ALICE ATIKENS, wife of the subscriber, now in this city,” Philadelphia, “has for some time past absented herself from my bed without any reason: This is therefore to caution all persons not to trust her on my account, as I am determined not to pay any debt she may contract.” John used standard language that could have appeared in any newspaper published anywhere in the colonies. Such notices, known to historians as runaway wife advertisements, ran regularly, often more than one in a given issue of a newspaper. They were a familiar mechanism for husbands to attempt to assert authority over wives they claimed misbehaved.
Yet they told only one side of the story … and since husbands refused to pay expenses incurred by their wives that meant that very few of the women featured in such advertisements published responses in the public prints. Alice was an exception. Her own advertisement ran in Pennsylvania Evening Post, declaring that “JOHN ATKINS, by trade a bricklayer, was seen wheeling a wheelbarrow across the Race Ground, for a woman selling liquor and had not been with me for six nights past.” Alice implied that John had been unfaithful or at least inappropriately directed his affections toward another woman. He may even have diverted his time away from earning a living by transporting liquor for the other woman when he should have been on a job. His absence might have been a relief of sorts because, Alice reported, “when he comes home, [John] pulls his wife’s cap and hair up by the root.” Many runaway wife advertisements likely concealed domestic abuse that caused women to flee from their husbands.
Alice concluded with familiar instructions to the public, though inverted to disadvantage an absent husband rather than a disobedient wife: “This is therefore to forewarn all persons not to trust him on my account, as I will pay none of his debts.” As a married woman, according to English common law, Alice held the status of a feme covert (or covered woman) whose legal identity had been subsumed by her husband. She did not have the authority to cut her husband off from credit, though she did find resources to place the advertisement. That final threat likely was not her purpose in placing the advertisement; instead, she wished to tell her side of the story and reveal the mistreatment she experienced at home. In so doing, she deployed a format readers easily recognized, making it more powerful by bending it to her own purpose.







































