What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

“I was a few days ago mortified with a report that he was brought to Williamsburg as a Tory.”
Marital discord often found its way into advertisements in early American newspapers, usually via notices placed by husbands to announce that their wives abandoned their households and warning merchants, shopkeepers, and others not to extend credit to them. The husbands thus controlled the narrative that appeared in print, though they could not exert the same amount of influence over gossip that circulated. On rare occasions, wives published responses that justified their actions and revealed abuse, neglect, and other bad behavior on the part of their husbands. In the summer of 1776, however, Elizabeth Minson placed an advertisement about her husband, Henry, in Alexander Purdie’s Virginia Gazettewithout first having been a subject of an advertisement placed by him. She suspected that some readers might be familiar with Henry because “for a number of years past [he] has been captain of several vessels in the employ of many gentlemen on James river.”
Her husband, Elizabeth lamented, “has thought fit, to leave me, his disconsolate wife, with his five children, without assigning any reason for so doing.” Under normal circumstances, that would have been distressing enough, but the war made the situation even worse. “[T]o add to my afflictions,” the aggrieved wife declared, “I was a few days ago mortified with a report that he was brought to Williamsburg as a Tory, and have never since heard of him.” Despite that report, she did not believe that her husband had been imprisoned or otherwise detained. Instead, she suspected that he resided in Hampton or Norfolk and asked readers to inform her of Henry’s whereabouts. Did Elizabeth intend to seek out her husband, reunite him with their five children, and compel him to resume his responsibilities as head of household and provider? Or did she have another motive for publishing this advertisement? Although she reported that he had abandoned his family “without assigning any reason,” she acknowledged the “many proofs of his affection for me, and tenderness for his children.” That caused her “to believe he has some private reasons for his being guilty of this inhuman act.” Whether “this inhuman act” referred to deserting his wife and children or siding with the Tories was not clear. In addition, Elizabeth did not explicitly reveal her own views on politics. Perhaps she published her advertisement as a strategy for protecting herself, her children, and the family’s property, hoping that Patriots would leave them alone because she expressed dismay at the report that her husband was a Tory and that Loyalists would similarly not bother them out of respect for Henry’s supposed allegiance.



























