What was advertised in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?
“He makes and sells all Kinds of FELT HATS.”
In the late 1760s and early 1770s the New-London Gazette carried fewer advertisements than most other newspapers printed in the colonies, in large part due to being published in a smaller town than most of its counterparts. Those advertisements that did appear in the New-London Gazette, however, tended to replicate the marketing strategies deployed in advertisements published in other newspapers. T.H. Breen asserts that colonists experienced a standardization of consumer goods available for purchase from New England to Georgia. They also encountered a standardization in advertising practices when they read the notices in colonial newspaper.
Consider an advertisement that Abiezer Smith, “HATTER, at NORWICH-LANDING,” placed in the April 20, 1770, edition of the New-London Gazette. He informed prospective customers that he had “served a regular Apprenticeship to the FELT MANUFACTURE.” Artisans frequently listed their credentials, especially upon arriving in town from elsewhere or opening a new business. Since they did not benefit from cultivating a reputation among local consumers over time, they adopted other means of signaling that they were qualified to follow the trade they advertised. In addition to consumers, Smith addressed retailers, the “Merchants and Shopkeepers in the Country” that he hoped would stock his hats.
Smith also made an appeal to quality and connected it to contemporary political discourse, just as advertisers in Boston and New York were doing during at the time. The hatter at Norwich Landing proclaimed that his hats were “equal in goodness to any manufactured in this Country.” Yet that assurance of quality was not sufficient. He also declared his wares were preferable to any imported from Europe or elsewhere.” Although the duties on most imported goods had been repealed, news had not yet arrived in the colonies. For the moment, Smith stood to benefit from nonimportation agreements that prompted consumers to purchase “domestic manufactures” instead, provided that he made prospective customers aware of his product. For retailers, he offered a new source of merchandise. Even though his appeal would have less political resonance in the coming months, the quality remained consistent. Many colonial consumers tended to prefer imported goods, but Smith offered an alternative that did not ask them to sacrifice the value for their money.
Smith’s advertisement could have appeared in any other newspaper in the colonies. Indeed, given the scarcity of advertising in the New-London Gazette, he very well may have consulted (or at least had in mind) newspapers from other towns and cities when he wrote the copy for his advertisement. His appeals that invoked his training, the quality of his wares, and the political significance of purchasing his hats made his advertisement resemble others placed by American artisans in the late 1760s and early 1770s.
 T.H. Breen, “‘Baubles of Britain’: The American and Consumer Revolutions of the Eighteenth Century,” Past and Present 119 (1988): 81-84