July 31

What was marketed in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago this month?

Massachusetts Spy (July 21, 1774).

“From the ROYAL AMERICAN MAGAZINE.”

Isaiah Thomas did not publish any newspaper advertisements for the Royal American Magazine in July 1774.  When he first proposed the magazine and sought subscribers, he ran advertisements in newspapers from New Hampshire to Maryland, sometimes dozens of them a month, yet once he published and distributed the first issue the extensive advertising campaign tapered off and, eventually, went on hiatus.  The Adverts 250 Project has tracked Thomas’s efforts to promote the Royal American Magazine from the first time he announced his intention to circulate subscription proposals in May 1773 through the advertisements in newspapers in June, July, August, September, October, November, and December 1773 and January, February, March, April, May, and June 1774.

In the eighteenth century, publishers typically distributed new issues at the end of the month, unlike today’s practice of circulating magazines in advance of the publication date.  Readers considered the January 1774 issue, for instance, an overview of that month, expecting to receive it just as February arrived.  Even by those standards, Thomas was perpetually behind in delivering the Royal American Magazine to subscribers.  He published the January issue on February 7 following a delay in receiving new types ordered for the magazine.  The May 1774 issue did not appear until June 17.

Newspaper advertisements do not reveal when the June 1774 issue became available to readers.  Thomas did not place any advertisements for the Royal American Magazine in July 1774, not even in his own newspaper, the Massachusetts Spy.  As Frank Luther Mott documents, Thomas did announce in the June issue that “he was under the necessity of suspending the publication of his magazine ‘for a few Months, until the Affairs of this Country are a little better settled.’”[1]  He lamented “the Distresses of the Town of Boston, by the shutting up of our Port, and throwing all Ranks of Men into confusion.”[2]  The Boston Port Act, one of the repercussions Parliament instituted following the Boston Tea Party, took its toll on the Royal American Magazine.  The magazine resumed publication in September, though by then Joseph Greenleaf was at the helm.

Although Thomas did not advertise the Royal American Magazine in July 1774, it did not go unreferenced in the public prints.  The “POETS CORNER,” a regular feature on the final pages of many colonial newspapers, in the July 21 edition of the Massachusetts Spy featured a poem by Bernard Romans “From the ROYAL AMERICAN MAGAZINE.”  It filled nearly an entire column.  On occasion, Thomas inserted excerpts from the magazine in the Massachusetts Spy or the Essex Journal, the newspaper that his junior partner, Henry-Walter Tinges, published in Salem.  That gave readers who had not yet subscribed a glimpse of the magazine’s content.  For previous issues, Thomas had also attempted to incited interest by including an extensive table of contents in his advertisements along with descriptions of the engravings that accompanied each issue.  Yet the lack of advertising for the June 1774 issue meant that he did not promote the frontispiece, “The Able Doctor, or America Swallowing the Bitter Draught.”  That political cartoon condemning the Boston Port Act, engraved by Paul Revere, fit with the politics of the magazine.  It remains one of the most significant images advocating the patriot cause produced in the colonies during the imperial crisis.  As savvy as Thomas was about publishing propaganda, he missed an opportunity to call attention to such a powerful image.

**********

[1] Frank Luther Mott, A History of American Magazines, 1741-1850 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1939), 85.

[2] Quoted in Mott, History of American Magazines, 85.

July 30

What was advertised in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Providence Gazette (July 30, 1774).

“HORSEMANSHIP … The original American Rider.”

A couple of days before his performance, Christopher H. Gardner, who billed himself as the “original American Rider,” placed an advertisement in the Providence Gazette to encourage the public to attend and witness his feats of “HORSEMANSHIP.”  He declared that he “will perform all the Parts which were exhibited in America by the celebrated Mr. Bates,” invoking the equestrian who had achieved considerable celebrity in the colonies over the past couple of years following a career performing in Europe.  Bates had demonstrated feats that included tricks involving “One, Two, and Three HORSES” in Philadelphia, New York, Boston, and Newport, advertising in newspapers in each city as he moved from one to the next.  Gardner asserted that he possessed the same skill as Bates, so spectators would be amazed and delighted by what they witnessed.  According to “good Judges,” Gardner’s performance “fully equals, or rather exceeds, any thing of the Kind evert performed on this Continent.” Readers did not want to miss it!

To make sure that they did not, they needed to purchase tickets in advance.  Gardner made clear that “No Money will be taken at the Door …, nor any Persons admitted without Tickets.”  The audience could purchase tickets in advance at two locations in town, remaining on sale until the moment that show began.  Spectators could arrive early to claim their seats, with the doors opening an hour before Gardner mounted.  The equestrian encouraged readers of both sexes to attend, promising that the “Seats are suitable for Ladies and Gentlemen.”  Dogs, on the other hand, were prohibited, presumably to prevent spooking the horses.  Bates had previously banned dogs from his performances as well.

Gardner did not have the extensive experience performing for monarchs and nobles in European courts that Bates so often touted in his advertisements, yet he “expect[ed] to give entire Satisfaction” to “those Ladies and Gentlemen who will oblige him with their Company.”  He aimed to create some buzz in advance of his performance, giving the public an opportunity to see feats that rivaled those done by Bates, but they had to act quickly to acquire their tickets before the show began.  Garnder intended for a combination of curiosity and anticipation to drive audiences to his show.

July 29

What was advertised in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?

New-Hampshire Gazette (July 29, 1774).

(The Particulars in our next)

In the summer of 1774, Richard Champney took to the pages of the New-Hampshire Gazette to announce that he “has just open’d a fresh Assortment of most Kinds of English and Hard Ware GOODS” at his shop in Portsmouth.  He pledged that customers could acquire his merchandise “as low as can be purchased in any shop in Town.”  When his advertisement first ran on July 22, it did not list any of those items.  Instead, a note promised, “The Particulars in our next.”  Most likely the compositor devised that note due to lack of space in that issue; Champney’s advertisement appeared in the final column on the third page, the last of the content that would have been prepared for any edition.

The following week, however, his advertisement did not include the “Particulars.”  It ran exactly as it had, without any revision, though the compositor managed to find room for a new advertisement that featured an extensive catalog of goods that John Penhallow “Imported from LONDON” and sold at his store.  Had someone in the printing office overlooked the copy that should have appeared in Champney’s advertisement?  Did the shopkeeper raise an objection when his complete advertisement did not run as planned?  Was he frustrated that a competitor achieved greater visibility in the public prints even though he submitted his advertisement a week earlier?

Some exchange might have occurred between Champney and the printing office to rectify the situation.  The complete advertisement finally found its way into print in the August 5 edition of the New-Hampshire Gazette, two weeks after the shopkeeper first alerted readers that he had a “fresh Assortment” of goods.  It listed dozens of items to entice consumers, simultaneously demonstrating that the choices he offered to customers rivaled what Penhallow and other advertisers presented to the public.  Promising the “Particulars” in the next issue may have encouraged anticipation among prospective customers, especially in an issue that included only one other advertisement for imported wares, that one from a milliner who promoted a narrow range of goods, but not following through on it did not serve Champney well when his competitors published their own catalogs of merchandise.  Even though his complete notice eventually ran, any advantage from being the first in print had been squandered.

Slavery Advertisements Published July 29, 1774

The Slavery Adverts 250 Project chronicles the role of newspaper advertising in perpetuating slavery in the era of the American Revolution. The project seeks to reveal the ubiquity of slavery in eighteenth-century life from New England to Georgia by republishing advertisements about enslaved people – for sale as individuals or in groups, wanted to purchase or for hire for short periods, runaways who liberated themselves, and those who were subsequently captured and confined in jails and workhouses – in daily digests on this site as well as in real time via the @SlaveAdverts250 Twitter feed, utilizing twenty-first-century media to stand in for the print media of the eighteenth century.

The project aims to provide modern audiences with a sense of just how often colonizers encountered these advertisements in their daily lives. Enslaved men, women, and children appeared in print somewhere in the colonies almost every single day. Those advertisements served as a constant backdrop for social, cultural, economic, and political life in colonial and revolutionary America. Colonizers who did not purport to own enslaved people were still confronted with slavery as well as invited to maintain the system by purchasing enslaved men, women, and children or assisting in the capture of so-called “runaways” who sought to free themselves from bondage. The frequency of these newspaper advertisements suggests just how embedded slavery was in colonial and revolutionary American culture in everyday interactions beyond the printed page.

These advertisements also testify to the experiences of enslaved men, women, and children, though readers must consider that those experiences have been remediated through descriptions offered by enslavers rather than enslaved people themselves. Often unnamed in the advertisements, enslaved men, women, and children were not invisible or unimportant in early America.

These advertisements appeared in colonial American newspapers 250 years ago today.

New-Hampshire Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina and American General Gazette (July 29, 1774).

July 28

What was advertised in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Rivington’s New-York Gazetteer (July 28, 1774).

“Excellent Tea.”

Despite the complicated politics of tea in the wake of the Boston Tea Party and the Boston Port Act that closed and blockaded the harbor as punishment, some merchants and shopkeepers continued to sell tea and printers continued to publish their advertisements in the summer of 1774.  At the same time that many advertisers quietly dropped tea from the lists of merchandise in their newspaper notices, others refused to do so.  In New York, for instance, Matthew Ernest enumerated a dozen commodities that customers could acquire at his store.  In capital letters in three columns, making each item easy for readers to spot, Ernest listed “RUM, WINE, GENEVA, BRANDY, SUGAR, TEA, COFFEE, PEPPER, ALSPICE, MOLASSES, GAMMONS, [and] BACON.”  The merchant supplied tea to consumers willing to purchase it.

Rivington’s New-York Gazetteer (July 28, 1774).

One printer, James Rivington, even sold tea himself or acted as a broker for a customer who did wish for their name to appear in print.  For many weeks, Rivington’s New-York Gazetteer ran an advertisement that announced “Excellent Tea” in a font much larger than almost anything else that appeared among news or advertisements.  It further clarified, “SUPERFINE HYSON, To be sold.  Enquire of the Printer.”  Colonial printers often stocked books, stationery, patent medicines, and other goods, so perhaps Rivington sought to supplement revenues with tea.  On the other hand, an advertisement on the same page as the “Excellent Tea” notice in the July 28 edition promoted “Middleton’s incomparible Pencils, Red and black Lead, Sold by James Rivington.”  Whether or not he was the purveyor of the tea or merely a broker, the printer disseminated the advertisement and sought to earn money through trucking in tea.

In Tea: Consumption, Politics, and Revolution, 1773-1776, James R. Fichter argues that most colonizers who continued to advertise tea did not face significant repercussions, quite a different interpretation than the traditional narrative.  “If we only look at people who got in trouble over tea,” Fichter states, “we will think tea was troublesome.  But if we note the hundreds of people who did not get in trouble over tea, we see a very different story.”[1]  Even as the imperial crisis intensified, there was still space in the public marketplace for advertising and selling tea in the summer of 1774.

**********

[1] James R. Fichter, Tea: Consumption, Politics, and Revolution, 1773-1776 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2023), 145.

Slavery Advertisements Published July 28, 1774

The Slavery Adverts 250 Project chronicles the role of newspaper advertising in perpetuating slavery in the era of the American Revolution. The project seeks to reveal the ubiquity of slavery in eighteenth-century life from New England to Georgia by republishing advertisements about enslaved people – for sale as individuals or in groups, wanted to purchase or for hire for short periods, runaways who liberated themselves, and those who were subsequently captured and confined in jails and workhouses – in daily digests on this site as well as in real time via the @SlaveAdverts250 Twitter feed, utilizing twenty-first-century media to stand in for the print media of the eighteenth century.

The project aims to provide modern audiences with a sense of just how often colonizers encountered these advertisements in their daily lives. Enslaved men, women, and children appeared in print somewhere in the colonies almost every single day. Those advertisements served as a constant backdrop for social, cultural, economic, and political life in colonial and revolutionary America. Colonizers who did not purport to own enslaved people were still confronted with slavery as well as invited to maintain the system by purchasing enslaved men, women, and children or assisting in the capture of so-called “runaways” who sought to free themselves from bondage. The frequency of these newspaper advertisements suggests just how embedded slavery was in colonial and revolutionary American culture in everyday interactions beyond the printed page.

These advertisements also testify to the experiences of enslaved men, women, and children, though readers must consider that those experiences have been remediated through descriptions offered by enslavers rather than enslaved people themselves. Often unnamed in the advertisements, enslaved men, women, and children were not invisible or unimportant in early America.

These advertisements appeared in colonial American newspapers 250 years ago today.

Maryland Gazette (June 28, 1774).

**********

Maryland Gazette (June 28, 1774).

**********

Supplement to the New-York Journal (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Purdie and Dixon] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

**********

Virginia Gazette [Rind] (June 28, 1774).

July 27

What was advertised in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Pennsylvania Journal (July 27, 1774).

“Many other articles, which will be sold low for cash, or a short credit.”

Levi Hollingsworth’s advertisement for a variety of goods available “at his Store, on Stamper’s wharf,” in Philadelphia in the July 27, 1774, edition of the Pennsylvania Journal appeared immediately below a masthead that featured a new image.  Previously, the device had four components.  In the center, a newspaper bearing the title “JOURNAL” sat on a pedestal above a cartouche that showed a ship at sea, those items testifying to information that the newspaper disseminated and the commerce that it facilitated.  An indigenous American on the left and an angel representing Fame on the right flanked the newspaper and ship.  The new device depicted a divided snake, each segment assigned to a colony, with the motto, “UNITE OR DIE.”

In recent weeks, at least two other American newspapers incorporated similar images into their mastheads.  The New-York Journal, printed by John Holt, had done so on June 23.  The images were so similar that William Bradford and Thomas Bradford, printers of the Pennsylvania Journal, likely copied directly from Holt’s newspaper after they received it via exchange networks that linked printers throughout the colonies.  On July 7, Isaiah Thomas adopted an even more elaborate image in the masthead of the Massachusetts Spy, one that showed a divided snake with a pointed tongue and a pointed tail facing off against a dragon that represented Great Britain.  Its admonition demanded that readers “JOIN OR DIE.”  Once the Bradfords updated their masthead, a newspaper published in three of the four largest American port cities circulated the divided snake political cartoon to subscribers and other readers every week.  The Pennsylvania Journalcontinued doing so for fifteen months, returning to its previous device at the end of October 1775.  By that time, the Revolutionary War had started.

In his History of Printing in America (1810), Isaiah Thomas stated that the Pennsylvania Journal “was devoted to the cause of the country.”[1]  Each time that Hollingsworth or other advertisers placed notices in that newspaper they aided in underwriting a partisan press that advocated for the rights of colonizers as British subjects and, eventually, independence from Great Britain.  Each time a reader perused those advertisements, they likely saw the political cartoon in the masthead, forced to engage with its message even if they did not read the news and editorials closely.

**********

[1] Isaiah Thomas, The History of Printing in America: With a Biography of Printers and an Account of Newspapers (1810; New York: Weathervane Books, 1970), 437.

Slavery Advertisements Published July 27, 1774

The Slavery Adverts 250 Project chronicles the role of newspaper advertising in perpetuating slavery in the era of the American Revolution. The project seeks to reveal the ubiquity of slavery in eighteenth-century life from New England to Georgia by republishing advertisements about enslaved people – for sale as individuals or in groups, wanted to purchase or for hire for short periods, runaways who liberated themselves, and those who were subsequently captured and confined in jails and workhouses – in daily digests on this site as well as in real time via the @SlaveAdverts250 Twitter feed, utilizing twenty-first-century media to stand in for the print media of the eighteenth century.

The project aims to provide modern audiences with a sense of just how often colonizers encountered these advertisements in their daily lives. Enslaved men, women, and children appeared in print somewhere in the colonies almost every single day. Those advertisements served as a constant backdrop for social, cultural, economic, and political life in colonial and revolutionary America. Colonizers who did not purport to own enslaved people were still confronted with slavery as well as invited to maintain the system by purchasing enslaved men, women, and children or assisting in the capture of so-called “runaways” who sought to free themselves from bondage. The frequency of these newspaper advertisements suggests just how embedded slavery was in colonial and revolutionary American culture in everyday interactions beyond the printed page.

These advertisements also testify to the experiences of enslaved men, women, and children, though readers must consider that those experiences have been remediated through descriptions offered by enslavers rather than enslaved people themselves. Often unnamed in the advertisements, enslaved men, women, and children were not invisible or unimportant in early America.

These advertisements appeared in colonial American newspapers 250 years ago today.

Pennsylvania Gazette (July 27, 1774).

**********

Pennsylvania Gazette (July 27, 1774).

**********

Supplement to the Pennsylvania Journal (July 27, 1774).

July 26

What was advertised in a colonial American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Essex Gazette (July 26, 1774).

“Public approbation … renders a pompous advertisement unnecessary.”

When Thomas Courtney and Son relocated from Boston to Salem, they ran in advertisement in the Essex Gazette to inform readers that they “carry on the different Branches of the Taylor and Habit-Making Business” at a shop near the courthouse.  They described themselves as “from LONDON,” hoping that their origins gave them some cachet among prospective clients, yet also reported that they had followed their trade “for six Years past in the Town of Boston.”

Their experience there served as even more of a recommendation and evidence that prospective customers should give them a chance.  The “Encouragement” they received for so many years, the tailors argued, “is a flattering proof of the Public’s Approbation of their Integrity and Abilities.”  No tailoring shop could have lasted for so long without the “Encouragement” of satisfied customers who gave them return business or offered positive reviews to friends.  Courtney and Son earned such a reputation that “renders a pompous Advertisement unnecessary.”  With that critique of the elaborate appeals made by some of their competitors and other purveyors of goods and services, the tailors expressed gratitude to former customers and declared that they “shall continue to deserve their Recommendation.”

It was not the first time that Courtney and Son deployed that marketing strategy.  Nine months earlier, they moved to a new location in Boston.  On that occasion, they ran an advertisement in the Massachusetts Spy.  Its copy was so similar, nearly identical, to their notice in the Essex Gazette that the tailors may have clipped it from the Massachusetts Spy and later from it.  The two advertisements featured variations in capitalization, not uncommon when advertisers ran notices in more than one newspaper.  In both, the phrase “pompous advertisement” appeared in italics.  While this does not reveal the effectiveness of the advertisement, it does suggest that Courtney and Son believed that it met with a positive reception that merited republishing it rather than devising other sorts of appeals to prospective customers in their new town.

Slavery Advertisements Published July 26, 1774

The Slavery Adverts 250 Project chronicles the role of newspaper advertising in perpetuating slavery in the era of the American Revolution. The project seeks to reveal the ubiquity of slavery in eighteenth-century life from New England to Georgia by republishing advertisements about enslaved people – for sale as individuals or in groups, wanted to purchase or for hire for short periods, runaways who liberated themselves, and those who were subsequently captured and confined in jails and workhouses – in daily digests on this site as well as in real time via the @SlaveAdverts250 Twitter feed, utilizing twenty-first-century media to stand in for the print media of the eighteenth century.

The project aims to provide modern audiences with a sense of just how often colonizers encountered these advertisements in their daily lives. Enslaved men, women, and children appeared in print somewhere in the colonies almost every single day. Those advertisements served as a constant backdrop for social, cultural, economic, and political life in colonial and revolutionary America. Colonizers who did not purport to own enslaved people were still confronted with slavery as well as invited to maintain the system by purchasing enslaved men, women, and children or assisting in the capture of so-called “runaways” who sought to free themselves from bondage. The frequency of these newspaper advertisements suggests just how embedded slavery was in colonial and revolutionary American culture in everyday interactions beyond the printed page.

These advertisements also testify to the experiences of enslaved men, women, and children, though readers must consider that those experiences have been remediated through descriptions offered by enslavers rather than enslaved people themselves. Often unnamed in the advertisements, enslaved men, women, and children were not invisible or unimportant in early America.

These advertisements appeared in colonial American newspapers 250 years ago today.

Essex Gazette (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).

**********

South-Carolina Gazette and Country Journal (July 26, 1774).