August 17

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Pennsylvania Ledger (August 17, 1776).

“PHILADELPHIA MANUFACTURE.”

In the summer of 1776, Samuel Wetherill took to the pages of the Pennsylvania Ledger to hawk a variety of textiles produced at his “Manufactory in South-street” in Philadelphia.  He offered “Woolens, Linnens, and Cottons, particularly Corded Dimity’s,” to consumers, giving them an alternative to fabrics imported from England.  He emphasized that he sold “domestic manufactures” with a headline that proclaimed, “PHILADELPHIA MANUFACTURE.”  Wetherill elaborated on that point by noting the “great expence” he had undertaken in his “improve manufactures among us” and, in turn, expected “the public encouragement” for his endeavor.

Wetherill was one of many advertisers who made some sort of “Buy American” appeal during the era of the American Revolution.  As T.H. Breen explains in The Marketplace of Revolution, calls to produce and purchase goods made in America began even before the imperial crisis.  As colonizers participated in the transatlantic consumer revolution, some noticed the imbalance of trade that emerged within a commercial empire organized around Britain producing goods and the colonies consuming those goods.  Once Parliament imposed new regulations on trade, especially duties on imported goods, and the colonies responded with boycotts of those goods, establishing and supporting the production of goods in the colonies became even more important.  When the Second Continental Congress devised the Continental Association, a nonimportation and nonconsumption agreement adopted throughout the colonies, the eighth article stated, “That we will, in our several Stations, encourage Frugality, Economy, and Industry; and promote Agriculture, Arts, and the Manufactures of this Country, especially that of Wool.”  Producing (and consuming) goods produced in America became even more important after the Continental Congress declared independence.

Wetherill did his part and he used an advertisement in the Pennsylvania Ledger to let prospective customers in Philadelphia and the region know that he did.  Along with his “attempt to improve manufactures among us” came a reciprocal obligation for consumers to give their “public encouragement” by purchasing the textiles that Wetherill and his employees produced “at his Manufactory.”  He presented an opportunity to acquire “PHILADELPHIA MANUFACTURE,” goods produced in their own city or state as a means of strengthening the local economy.

August 4

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

Pennsylvania Ledger (August 3, 1776).

“For the benefit of others I desire that you may make my case public, that those being imposed upon and labouring under the same complaint may know where to apply for a cure.”

Testimonials worked!  Anthony Yeldall must have thought so because the apothecary repeatedly included testimonials from grateful patients in his newspaper advertisements.  Perhaps some patients mentioned testimonials they read in his advertisements when they consulted him “at his Medicinal ware house” in Philadelphia, prompting him to publish more testimonials.  The testimonials often accounted for much more space than any copy that Yeldall wrote himself.  His advertisement in the August 3, 1776, edition of the Pennsylvania Ledger, for instance, consisted of five paragraphs.  The last four were testimonials that his patients stated that they wanted published “[f]or the benefit of others.”  It was one thing for the apothecary to claim that his “Abilities are well known through most parts of the United Colonies,” but the testimonials demonstrated that was indeed the case.  Joseph Spenser, “Grocer in Second-street,” Benjamin Wilson, “Elizabeth-town, New-Jersey,” Christopher Hughes, “Bedminster-township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania,” and William Bell, “Vincent township, Chester County, Pennsylvania,” each praised the treatment that “DOCTOR YELDALL” provided.

Those testimonials had some common features that suggest Yeldall may have worked with his patients in composing their testimonials or they may have used testimonials that appeared in previous advertisements as models.  Three of the testimonials began with “For the benefit of others” and a request “that my case may be made public” (or some close variation of that phrase).  Hughes expressed similar sentiments but deviated from the formulaic language used by the others: “being desirous that they may reap the same benefit that I have done, I desire that you may make my case public.”  Each testimonial made clear that Yeldall published success stories at the behest of patients he returned to good health.  They did not make their way into print solely due to the self-interest of an apothecary seeking more patients.  Each also told a frustrating story about seeking medical care from physicians and surgeons whose assistance proved ineffective before turning to Yeldall for treatments that returned them to full health.  Spenser, for instance, “applied to several able Physicians in the city, but could find no relief” for a pain that cause him to lose the use of his arm.  He then turned to Yeldall, “who in a short time removed the pain, restored the use of my arm, and I now follow my business.”

Yeldall certainly considered testimonials effective when he decided on his marketing strategy.  He would not have continued to publish them (and invest so much in the space required for each testimonial) if he did believe that they yielded a return on his investment in placing them in the public prints.  He likely appreciated that testimonials helped build trust with patients before they even consulted him for “advice and medicines.”

July 21

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

Pennsylvania Ledger (July 20, 1776).

“Simes’s Military Guide for officers, 2 vol.”

After the Continental Congress voted to declare independence on July 2, 1776, and approved the Declaration of Independence two days later, the war that began with the skirmishes at Concord and Lexington in Massachusetts had a new purpose.  Colonizers and subjects of George III no longer fought for redress of grievances within the British imperial system; instead, settlers and citizens of a new nation fought for independence from that empire.  The military manuals that American printers had been printing, advertising, and selling for the past two years and longer were as important as ever.  Printers and booksellers continued promoting them in newspaper advertisements.

In an advertisement in the first column on the first page of the July 20 edition of the Pennsylvania Ledger, for instance, James Humphreys, Jr., the printer of that newspaper, declared that “A few Copies of the Military Guide FOR YOUNG OFFICERS, By THOMAS SIMES … embellished with a Number of Copperplates … May be had of the PRINTER hereof.”  Humphreys jointly published Simes’s military manual with Robert Aitken and Robert Bell.  For several months he had been hawking the book.  Bell also continued advertising and selling it.  In his own advertisement on the last page of that issue of the Pennsylvania Ledger, he listed it among the “following MILITARY WORKS, some of them very valuable, and seldom to be met with, [that] may be had at R. BELL’s.”  He also stocked “New System of Military Discipline, founded on Principle, by a General Officer,” a manual that Aitken printed and previously advertised, and “Hoste and Webster’s Mechanics, Fortification, Artillery, or Gunnery, adapted to the use of the Gentlemen of the Army and Navy.”  Bell did not mention the copperplate engravings that illustrated Simes’s military manual, but he did note that “LE Blond’s Military Engineer, containing the attack and defence of all kinds of fortified places” came with “numerous and excellent copperplates.”  He also carried copies of “ARCHITECTURE HYDRAULIQUE,” a manual on hydraulic architecture and “usage du cours des eaux dans les operations de la Guerre des Sieges & de Campaign” [utilizing watercourses in siege and field warfare operations], for readers who understood French.  Not surprisingly, printers and booksellers highlighted military manuals in their newspaper advertisements during the Revolutionary War.

July 13

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Pennsylvania Ledger (July 13, 1776).

“The True Interest of America Impartially Stated.”

A week after the Pennsylvania Evening Post became the first newspaper to publish the Declaration of Independence, the Pennsylvania Ledger became the last newspaper printed in Philadelphia to carry that momentous document.  The news had certainly reached readers by word of mouth long before July 13.  Some may have attended the public reading of the Declaration of Independence at the Pennsylvania State House (now known as Independence Hall) on July 8.  They could have also read the document in the Pennsylvania Ledger (July 6), Dunlap’s Pennsylvania Packet (July 8), Henrich Millers Pennsylvanischer Staatsbote (in German, July 9), the Pennsylvania Gazette (July 10), or the Pennsylvania Journal (July 10).  The text may not have been readily available to James Humphreys, Jr., in time for the July 6 edition of the Pennsylvania Ledger, though he may not have invested the same effort in acquiring it as did Benjamin Towne, the printer of the Pennsylvania Evening Post.  Like the printers of the other newspapers published in Philadelphia, Humphreys did not move forward his weekly publication schedule to disseminate the Declaration of Independence, nor did he print a supplement or extraordinary issue.

Still, Humphreys may have published the Declaration of Independence with less enthusiasm than his fellow printers in Philadelphia.  Humphreys was widely suspected of being a Loyalist, though Isaiah Thomas, a printer who did not shy away from condemning other printers who did not support the American cause, had a more nuanced view of Humphreys and “his intention to conduct his paper with political impartiality.”  Thomas noted “perhaps, in times more tranquil than those in which it appeared, he might have succeeded in his plan.”  Humphreys stood by his “oath of allegiance to the king of England … and refused to bear arms against the British government; in consequence of which, he was deemed a tory, and his paper denounced as being under corrupt influence.”[1]  In the end, the “impartiality of the Ledger did not comport with the temper of the times” and Humphreys left Philadelphia for his safety by the end of 1776.  He eventually returned during the British occupation of the city, accompanied the army to New York, and, following the war, established a newspaper, the Nova Scotia Packet, in Shelburne, a town founded by Loyalists who went into exile.[2]

That “impartiality” described by Thomas found expression in other items that came off Humphreys’s press and appeared in advertisements in the Pennsylvania Ledger.  Without comment on the contents of the pamphlet, Thomas reported that Humphreys printed “Strictures on Paine’s Common Sense.  Two editions …, consisting of several thousand copies each, were sold in a few months.”[3]  The True Interest of America Impartially Stated, as the pamphlet was also known, offered a response to Common Sense.  Humphreys placed an advertisement for the second edition of The True Interest of America Impartially Stated on the first page of the issue of the Pennsylvania Ledger that carried the Declaration of Independence.  That document appeared on the second page, though probably not the result of Humphreys inserting news only when it arrived.  He almost certainly had access to a copy of the Declaration of Independence with sufficient time to place it on the front page of the Pennsylvania Ledger if he wished.  After all, the printers of the Pennsylvania Gazette and the Pennsylvania Journal made room for the Declaration of Independence on the front page of their newspapers three days earlier.

The advertisement for The True Interest of America Impartially Stated even carried a quotation from the Continental Congress’s “Address to the People of Great-Britain” in October 1774 that contradicted the action they took in declaring independence less than two years later: “You have been told that we are seditious, impatient of government, and desirous of Independency.  Be assured that these are not Facts, but Calumnies – Permit us to be as free as yourselves, and we shall ever esteem a union with you to be our greatest glory and our greatest happiness. – Place us in the same situation we were at the close of the last war, and our former harmony will be restored.”  Even as Humphreys published the Declaration of Independence in the Pennsylvania Ledger, not all readers celebrated or agreed with the action taken by the Continental Congress.  The Revolutionary War became a civil war among colonizers as much as a contest between a nation seeking independence and Great Britain.

**********

[1] Isaiah Thomas, The History of Printing in America: With a Biography of Printers and an Account of Newspapers (1810; New York: Weathervane Books, 1970), 439-440.

[2] Thomas, History of Printing, 398.

[3] Thomas, History of Printing, 397.

June 9

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

Pennsylvania Ledger (June 8, 1776).

“THE Copartnership of HAMILTON and LEIPER, Tobacconists, is dissolved.”

The “Copartnership of HAMILTON and LEIPER, Tobacconists,” provided their products to consumers for more than half a decade in the early 1770s.  In May 1772, they placed an advertisement in the Pennsylvania Gazette to advise the public that they “established a MANUFACTORY in Market-street, Baltimore,” and they continued “to manufacture and sell as usual at Frederick-Town,” Maryland.  (At the time, Baltimore did not yet have its own newspapers, so the partners resorted to the Pennsylvania Gazette as a regional newspaper for their advertisement.)  Less than a year and a half later, they opened a new location in Philadelphia. In an advertisement in the Pennsylvania Journal in September 1772, they promoted “KITE-FOOT TOBACCO … manufactured and sold … In Second-street,” Philadelphia.  To entice prospective customers who might not believe that their tobacco was “Of an excellent quality, equal to any imported from Europe,” Hamilton and Leiper made samples available “at the Bar of the London Coffee-House.”

As summer arrived in 1776, however, Hamilton and Leiper ran a new advertisement in the Pennsylvania Ledger, this time announcing that they dissolved their partnership and calling on associates who “have any demand against that concern … to bring in their accounts as soon as possible.”  They could present any such accounts to Leiper “in the house lately occupied by the Company, at the corner of Spruce and Water-streets,” or to Hamilton and Son “in Second-street.”  That notice implied that Hamilton and Son commenced their own partnership.  An advertisement that conveniently appeared immediately below that notice made clear that “HAMILTON and SON, Tobacconists[,] … continue to carry on their Scotch snuff and to bacco Manufactory in all the several branches as usual.”  To that end, they “have laid in a large stock of the very best Virginia leaf tobacco.”  The news partners declared that they “are confident of giving the utmost satisfaction to their former customers and the publick” and pledged that orders “will be punctually answer’d with all possible dispatch.”  In running one advertisement after the other, they aimed to maintain the clientele that Hamilton and Leiper had cultivated over several years in business together.

May 12

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

Pennsylvania Ledger (May 11, 1776).

“All the newest political pamphlets, either for or against independency, may be had at said Bell’s.”

Robert Bell, one of the most prominent American printers and booksellers of the second half of the eighteenth century, advertised his publications widely.  In the spring of 1776, he ran an advertisement that announced, “Just printed, published and now selling … THE DISEASES incident to ARMIES” and other medical treatises compiled in a single volume “for the use of military and naval surgeons.  He deployed identical copy in the Pennsylvania Evening Post and the Pennsylvania Ledger, stating that the volume would “contributeth to promote the health and happiness of such valuable lives as those of American soldiers and sailors.”  The savvy publisher sought to convince “land and sea officers,” in particular, and “all the friends of liberty and humanity,” in general, that they should endorse the publication and perhaps even purchase copies to supply to “military and naval surgeons” who treated American soldiers and sailors.

Despite such marketing appeals, Bell did not take a position on whether the colonies should declare independence, at least not in the works he selected to print, advertise, and sell.  He concluded his advertisement with at noted that “All the newest political pamphlets, either for or against independency, may be had at said Bell’s.”  Other printers and booksellers had pursued a similar course, though not as recently.  James Humphreys, Jr., the printer of the Pennsylvania Ledger, advertised “POLITICAL PAMPHLETS, ON Both Sides of the Question” a month after the battles at Lexington and Concord.  James Rivington listed political pamphlets that took opposing positions, some of them written in direct response to others, in advertisements with headlines like “THE AMERICAN CONTEST” and “The American Controversy” before the Sons of Liberty attacked his office, destroyed his press, and forced him to discontinue publishing Rivington’s New-York Gazetteer.  More than a year into the war, Bell was the only printer who promoted pamphlets “for or against independency” in his advertisements.  Other printers and booksellers likely stocked and sold some of those pamphlets, but they did not call attention to it as boldly as Bell did.

Pennsylvania Ledger (May 12, 1776).

Indeed, an advertisement for the second edition of Plain Truth appeared immediately below Bell’s advertisement for the medical manual in the May 11 edition of the Pennsylvania Ledger.  That pamphlet “contain[ed] remarks on … COMMON SENSE; Wherein are shewn that the Scheme of Independence is ruinous, delusive and impracticable.”  In another advertisement in the same issue, Bell advertised “Additions to Plain Truth.”  In both advertisements, he made an appeal for freedom of the press to justify publishing and selling “political pamphlets, either for or against independency.”  A nota bene at the end of the first advertisement declared, “To this pamphlet is subjoined a Defence of the Liberty of the Press, by the sagacious and patriotic Junius.”  The other pamphlet, according to the second advertisement, included a similar supplementary work.  “To this Pamphlet is annexed, for the information of all Americans, who wish to know and to enjoy the very Laws and Privileges which themselves have decreed,” a nota bene announced, “A Defence of the Liberty of the Press, by the Honorable the CONTINENTAL CONGRESS.”  If that did not provide sufficient cover, Bell also opined, “The enjoyment of Liberty, and even its support and preservation consists, in every man’s being allowed to speak his thoughts and lay open his sentiments.”  Bell had also published the first edition of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense, demonstrating that his press did disseminate diverse political views.

The advertisement concluded with a “Memorandum,” perhaps penned by Bell or possibly inserted by Humphreys, a loyalist printer known for charting a more moderate course than fellow printers in Philadelphia.  “If to preserve any part of the works of valuable writers, hath been looked upon as doing good service to the Public,” the memorandum explained, “The EDITOR hereof may hope, this his present endeavours will prove acceptable, at least to all the Loversof Freedom.”  Leveraging the principles that those “Lovers of Freedom” embraced and enunciated, the memorandum insisted that they must be “so consistent as to acknowledge the Press ought to be free for others as well as themselves.” They could not have it both ways and still claim to be “Lovers of Freedom.”  Rivington had made similar arguments.  Bell and Humphreys hoped for more success in doing so, encouraging greater consistency in their views about “Libertyof the Press” from those who did not like everything that they printed or sold.

May 4

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Pennsylvania Ledger (May 4, 1776).

His large and elegant STOCK of China, Glass and Earthern Wares.”

The extensive advertisement for a “large and elegant STOCK of China, Glass and Earthern Wares” that Joseph Stansbury ran in the May 4, 1776, edition of the Pennsylvania Ledger looked more like advertisements that appeared before the Continental Association went into effect on December 1, 1774, and before the war began on April 19, 1775.  It filled an entire column, listing countless items that Stansbury sticked at his store “opposite Christ Church [in] Philadelphia.”

To help prospective customers navigate his inventory, Stansbury used headings for “CHINA,” “GLASS,” and “EARTHERN WARE.”  To make the most efficient use of the space, he divided the column into two columns with a line of decorative type running down the center.  Under each heading, he grouped similar items together and, when their description extended more than one line, indented the second and subsequent lines so the resulting white space guided readers.  Some categories of goods were short, just two lines, such as “Rich enamelled tea-table sets complete” and “Blue and white soup terrines, two sizes.”  Others were much longer, including one that extended for twenty-two lines.  That one offered “Cream-pots, salts, mustards, pepper-castors, egg slices, custard cups, blamange moulds, cheese-toasters, cream-buckets, Italian lamps for the chambers of the sick, garden pots, flower horns, jarrs and beakers, sauce-boats, terrines, butter-tubs and stands, egg cups, bottles and basons, water dishes, fish drainers, cream cheese dishes, chamberpots, pattypans, baking dishes, compotiers, pudding dishes, pap boats, sallad dishes, plates, oblong dishes, mugs, jugs, childrens tea sets, whistling birds, &c.”  The “&c.” (the abbreviation for et cetera commonly used in the eighteenth century) suggested an even greater array of goods available to consumers who visited Stansbury’s store.  He promoted “a great choice of patterns” among his “Chocolate, & coffee tea-cups and saucers,” part of his larger theme of presenting all kinds of choices to consumers.

Stansbury encouraged the sort of conspicuous consumption that had become increasingly popular in the middle decades of the eighteenth century as colonizers participated in a transatlantic consumer revolution.  A series of boycotts (known at the time as nonimportation and nonconsumption agreements) during the imperial crisis and then the disruptions to trade during the war prompted many merchants, shopkeepers, and consumers to suspend some of their operations or abstain from importing and purchasing all sorts of goods.  Stansbury’s advertisement, however, testified to an active market or, at least, his desire to continue making sales despite the trying times.  As a Loyalist, Stansbury may not have much cared about the Patriot position when he ran his advertisement.  He was imprisoned later in 1776 for boisterously singing “God Save the King” and eventually served as an intermediary between Benedict Arnold and John André.

April 7

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

Pennsylvania Ledger (April 6, 1776).

“A few Copies of the Military Guide, FOR YOUNG OFFICERS.”

James Humphreys, Jr., the printer of the Pennsylvania Ledger, was so eager to sell surplus copies of Thomas Simes’s “Military Guide FOR YOUNG OFFICERS” that he inserted two advertisements in the April 6, 1776, edition of his newspaper.  A shorter notice appeared on the third page and a longer one on the fourth page.

Humphreys previously collaborated with Robert Aitken and Robert Bell in circulating subscription proposals for a local edition of the military manual originally published in London.  In an advertisement in the December 2, 1775, edition of the Pennsylvania Ledger, the printers declared that they took on the project “By Desire of some [of] the Members of the Honourable the American Continental CONGRESS, and some of the Military Officers of the Association.”  A few months later, they repeated that assertion in the longer advertisement that listed all three of their names and locations. That notice also featured other details from the subscription proposals, noting that the work was “a large and valuable Compilation from the most celebrated Military Writers” that included “an excellent Military, Historical and Explanatory DICTIONARY.”  The proposals had not, however, mentioned illustrations, but the advertisement that announced the two-volume set was “Printed and Published” informed readers that the “whole is illustrated with Eleven Copperplates.”  It concluded with a nota bene that instructed subscribers who had reserved copies in advance “to call or send for their Books.”  Aitken, Bell, and Humphreys had been running that advertisement in the Pennsylvania Evening Post and the Pennsylvania Ledger since late February.

Once the subscribers collected their books, Humphreys apparently had extra copies that he hoped to sell.  As long as they remained at his printing office they cut into any profits he earned on the venture.  In a streamlined advertisement, he announced that “A few Copies of the Military Guide, FOR YOUNG OFFICERS, By THOMAS SIMES, Esquire, In Two Volumes, large Octavo, embellished with a Number of Copperplates, (Price Three Dollars) May be had of the PRINTER hereof.”  Between the advertisement on the following page and the notices that already circulated widely, Humphreys assumed that prospective customers were already familiar with the local edition of Simes’s military manual.  It was one of many such works among “a flood of printings” in Philadelphia “to meet the demand for military texts,” according to the American Revolution Institute of the Society of the Cincinnati, yet that demand did not necessarily mean that copies sold themselves.  Aitken, Bell, and Humphreys carefully crafted a marketing campaign to enlist subscribers and then Humphreys still had “A few Copies” he hoped to sell.  He may have hoped that news that British troops evacuated Boston on March 17 would incite new demand for Simes’s manual.

March 31

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago this week?

Supplement to the Pennsylvania Ledger (March 30, 1776).

“BLANKS and HAND-BILLS in particular are done on the shortest notice.”

In the spring of 1776, Melchior Steiner and Charles (Carl) Cist ran an advertisement “to acquaint the public, that they have removed their PRINTING OFFICE to the house of Ludwick Sprogrell, in Second-street” in Philadelphia.  In their new location, the partners “carry on the PRINTING-BUSINESS in its different branches, in the English, German, and other languages, with care, fidelity & dispatch.”  That had been a common appeal in advertisements that they previously placed in several newspapers in December and January, emphasized in a headline that proclaimed, “PRINTING In ENGLISH, GERMAN, and other Languages.”  By the time they relocated, Steiner and Cist collaborated with William Bradford and Thomas Bradford, the printers of the Pennsylvania Journal, in printing a new edition of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense approved by the author and a German translation of the popular pamphlet.

Yet the printers did not limit themselves to books and pamphlets and other major projects.  They concluded their advertisement with a note that “BLANKS and HAND-BILLS in particular are done on the shortest notice.”  In other words, they accepted all sorts of smaller job printing assignments, quickly producing documents useful in business.  “BLANKS” referred to a variety of forms so commonly used that it saved time to print them in volume and then write the details by hand for each transaction.  In an advertisement in the Providence Gazette, John Carter listed more than a dozen kinds of blanks he printed, including “long and short Powers of Attorney, long and short Deeds, Bills of Sale, Bills of Lading, Portage Bills, Policies of Insurance, Apprentices Indentures, [and] Bonds of various Sorts.”  When it came to “HAND-BILLS,” customers used them to promote consumer goods and services, sometimes supplementing newspaper advertisements, and to disseminate news about politics, meetings, and other current events.  That printers so often advertised that they printed handbills suggests that many more of those items circulated in early American cities and towns than have survived in research libraries, historical societies, and private collections.  Steiner and Cist printed both blanks and handbills “on the shortest notice,” indicating that customers expected their orders to be filled speedily so they could get more information into circulation.

March 16

What was advertised in a revolutionary American newspaper 250 years ago today?

Pennsylvania Ledger (March 16, 1776).

“PLAIN TRUTH … containing Remarks on a late Pamphlet intituled COMMON SENSE.”

Robert Bell published the first edition of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense on January 9, 1776, and not long after that he published a response, “PLAIN TRUTH; addressed to the INHABITANTS of AMERICA, containing Remarks on a late Pamphlet intituled COMMON SENSE.”  As was often the case in eighteenth-century advertisements for books and pamphlets, Bell used the extensive subtitle as the copy for marketing the volume: “Wherein are shewn, that the Scheme of INDEPENDENCE is Ruinous, Delusive, and impracticable: That were the Author’s Asseverations, respecting the Power of AMERICA, as Real as Nugatory, Reconciliation, on liberal Principles with GREAT-BRITAIN would be exalted Policy: And that, circumstances as we are, permanent Liberty, and true Happiness can only be obtained by Reconciliation with that Kingdon.”

According to Thomas R. Adams, only two pamphlets answered Common Sense in the six months between its publication in January and the Continental Congress declaring independence in July.  Robert Bell first advertised Plain Truth in the Pennsylvania Gazette on March 13.  Near the end of May, James Humphreys, Jr., published The True Interest of America Impartially Stated in Certain Strictures on a Pamphlet Intitled Common Sense.[1]  Bell quickly placed advertisements in other newspapers printed in Philadelphia, including the Pennsylvania Evening Post on March 14 and the Pennsylvania Ledger on March 16.  In each advertisement, he set the price at three shillings for a single copy “with large allowance to those who buy per the hundred or dozen.”  In other words, Bell offered a significant discount for buying in volume, hoping to make the pamphlet more attractive to consumers who might buy a dozen to share with friends and retailers who might buy a hundred to sell in their own shops in Philadelphia and beyond.  He may not have anticipated that Plain Truth would achieve the same popularity as Common Sense, yet he was still a savvy entrepreneur who aimed to generate revenue from the debate over declaring independence.  “To this Pamphlet is subjoined,” a nota bene at the end of the advertisement informed readers, “a Defence of the Liberty of the Press.”  Adams asserts that Bell “pleaded for the right to present both sides of the question.  No doubt he hoped thereby to increase the sales of both pamphlets.”[2]  James Rivington had done the same in advertisements with headlines like “THE AMERICAN CONTEST” and “The American Controversy” that promoted pamphlets “on both sides, in the unhappy dispute with Great-Britain.”  Humphreys, who eventually published The True Interest of America Impartially Stated, also ran advertisements for “POLITICAL PAMPHLETS, ON Both Sides of the Question.”  Such pamphlets educated colonizers and helped them understand and formulate their own positions, yet they also presented opportunities for printers to generate revenue from current events.

**********

[1] Thomas R. Adams, “The Authorship and Printing of Plain Truth by ‘Candidus,’” Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 49, no. 3 (1955): 230-231.

[2] Adams, “Authorship and Printing,” 235.